News
Stay up to date on the latest crypto trends with our expert, in-depth coverage.
Micron Technology Surges Over 7%, Hits New All-Time High, Market Cap Exceeds $900 Billion
BlockBeats·2026/05/11 13:40
Will Pi Network price drop back to $0.15 as it forms bearish divergence?
Crypto.News·2026/05/11 13:31
Barrick’s $3B buyback sets stage for North American spinoff
Mining.com·2026/05/11 13:21
Norwegian Krone: Norges Bank's surprise hike and risk support – HSBC
FXStreet·2026/05/11 13:21
Over $118M in Crypto Unlocks Hit Markets Between May 11 and 17
BlockchainReporter·2026/05/11 13:12
XRP NEWS: JPMorgan and Mastercard Leverage XRP Ledger for Tokenized Treasury Redemptions
Coinspeaker·2026/05/11 13:06
JPMorgan Revealed It Uses of XRP Ledger. Goldman Sachs and Citi Up Next?
TimesTabloid·2026/05/11 13:03
ECB’s Kocher: Stagflation Risk “Cannot Be Ruled Out”
ForexFactory·2026/05/11 13:03
Why Chainlink CCIP Is Drawing Billions in DeFi Migration From LayerZero
DailyCoin·2026/05/11 13:03
Flash
07:55
Zimbabwe lowers gasoline and diesel pricesDiesel prices will drop from $2.09 per liter to $1.99 per liter.
07:52
Galaxy Digital Head of Research reveals updates on the Satoshi Nakamoto Bitcoin lawsuit, amicus brief prevents default judgmentAlex Thorn, Head of Research at Galaxy Digital, disclosed progress in a lawsuit where two Wyoming-based companies are attempting to classify 39,069 dormant Bitcoin addresses as abandoned property. On May 29, attorney Ian R. Cohen submitted an amicus curiae brief, arguing that dormancy does not equate to abandonment. On June 4, Judge Kathy King issued a stay order, preventing the plaintiffs from obtaining ownership through a default judgment. On June 19, Ian R. Cohen countered that the plaintiffs set the value at $10 to circumvent the threshold, and on-chain data shows that 52 addresses moved 34,335 BTC, with 29 addresses transferring 12,302 BTC after being served, undermining the premise of abandoned assets.
07:52
Latest update on legal ownership case of Satoshi's Bitcoin claims: lawyers request to avoid unilateral judgment, claiming that long-term inactivity of BTC addresses does not equate to loss or abandonmentAccording to ChainCatcher, analyst Alex Thorn stated that the case is still under review. If a default judgment occurs, it could have a profound impact on the legal definition of self-custodied Bitcoin assets and trigger a long-term debate over whether "dormant addresses are equivalent to ownerless assets."