News
Stay up to date on the latest crypto trends with our expert, in-depth coverage.
Spores Network And Metay Join Forces To Accelerate Scale AI-Driven Web3 Applications Using Decentralized Computing
BlockchainReporter·2026/05/11 18:12
Ionic-led project demonstrates viable recycled rare earth supply chain for EV motors
Mining.com·2026/05/11 18:09
Egrag Crypto to XRP Holders: How Can You Not Be Excited About the Future? Here’s why
TimesTabloid·2026/05/11 18:03
Crypto’s X feed turns into a live tape for policy, halving and AI fear
Crypto.News·2026/05/11 17:57
BTC drops below 81000 as CRV eyes 30 percent gain
Cointurk·2026/05/11 17:54
Trump suspends $0.18 gas tax as US inflation nears 0.2 percent
Cointurk·2026/05/11 17:42
Dogecoin Price Set To Hit $5 Amid New Influx From Smart Money?
Newsbtc·2026/05/11 17:36
Ignition Casino: Online Poker With Bitcoin Explained for Crypto Readers
DailyCoin·2026/05/11 17:33
Rare earths get bulk of Trump’s ‘uneven’ $18.6B funding despite small role
Mining.com·2026/05/11 17:30
Flash
07:55
Zimbabwe lowers gasoline and diesel pricesDiesel prices will drop from $2.09 per liter to $1.99 per liter.
07:52
Galaxy Digital Head of Research reveals updates on the Satoshi Nakamoto Bitcoin lawsuit, amicus brief prevents default judgmentAlex Thorn, Head of Research at Galaxy Digital, disclosed progress in a lawsuit where two Wyoming-based companies are attempting to classify 39,069 dormant Bitcoin addresses as abandoned property. On May 29, attorney Ian R. Cohen submitted an amicus curiae brief, arguing that dormancy does not equate to abandonment. On June 4, Judge Kathy King issued a stay order, preventing the plaintiffs from obtaining ownership through a default judgment. On June 19, Ian R. Cohen countered that the plaintiffs set the value at $10 to circumvent the threshold, and on-chain data shows that 52 addresses moved 34,335 BTC, with 29 addresses transferring 12,302 BTC after being served, undermining the premise of abandoned assets.
07:52
Latest update on legal ownership case of Satoshi's Bitcoin claims: lawyers request to avoid unilateral judgment, claiming that long-term inactivity of BTC addresses does not equate to loss or abandonmentAccording to ChainCatcher, analyst Alex Thorn stated that the case is still under review. If a default judgment occurs, it could have a profound impact on the legal definition of self-custodied Bitcoin assets and trigger a long-term debate over whether "dormant addresses are equivalent to ownerless assets."
Trending news
MoreGalaxy Digital Head of Research reveals updates on the Satoshi Nakamoto Bitcoin lawsuit, amicus brief prevents default judgment
Latest update on legal ownership case of Satoshi's Bitcoin claims: lawyers request to avoid unilateral judgment, claiming that long-term inactivity of BTC addresses does not equate to loss or abandonment