News
Stay up to date on the latest crypto trends with our expert, in-depth coverage.
Circle Gives AI Agents USDC Stablecoin Powers Alongside $222M Arc Token Sale
Decrypt·2026/05/11 21:46
Chinese Crypto Trader Shares Altcoin with the “Cleanest” Technical Outlook!
CryptoNewsNet·2026/05/11 21:45
American Bitcoin defends cheapest US miner status
Crypto.News·2026/05/11 21:45
Taiwan: Mild tightening path in 2H – DBS
FXStreet·2026/05/11 21:42
Chinese Yuan: Strengthens into US–China summit – Societe Generale
FXStreet·2026/05/11 21:42
Ethereum Foundation names three new co-leads to major Protocol cluster
The Block·2026/05/11 21:27
Galiano assays expand Asanko gold mine in Ghana
Mining.com·2026/05/11 21:21
IREN Nvidia deal signals $3.4B AI pivot
Crypto.News·2026/05/11 21:21
Strategy May Be Buying Bitcoin Again Despite Q1 Sell Talk
Newsbtc·2026/05/11 21:12
Spain’s CNMV Fines Gerard Piqué 4 Times What He Made From Insider Trading Tip
BeInCrypto·2026/05/11 21:12
Flash
07:55
Zimbabwe lowers gasoline and diesel pricesDiesel prices will drop from $2.09 per liter to $1.99 per liter.
07:52
Galaxy Digital Head of Research reveals updates on the Satoshi Nakamoto Bitcoin lawsuit, amicus brief prevents default judgmentAlex Thorn, Head of Research at Galaxy Digital, disclosed progress in a lawsuit where two Wyoming-based companies are attempting to classify 39,069 dormant Bitcoin addresses as abandoned property. On May 29, attorney Ian R. Cohen submitted an amicus curiae brief, arguing that dormancy does not equate to abandonment. On June 4, Judge Kathy King issued a stay order, preventing the plaintiffs from obtaining ownership through a default judgment. On June 19, Ian R. Cohen countered that the plaintiffs set the value at $10 to circumvent the threshold, and on-chain data shows that 52 addresses moved 34,335 BTC, with 29 addresses transferring 12,302 BTC after being served, undermining the premise of abandoned assets.
07:52
Latest update on legal ownership case of Satoshi's Bitcoin claims: lawyers request to avoid unilateral judgment, claiming that long-term inactivity of BTC addresses does not equate to loss or abandonmentAccording to ChainCatcher, analyst Alex Thorn stated that the case is still under review. If a default judgment occurs, it could have a profound impact on the legal definition of self-custodied Bitcoin assets and trigger a long-term debate over whether "dormant addresses are equivalent to ownerless assets."