イーサリアムクラシック（Ethereum Classic）の‌価格ETC

I will start spot buying in steps using an onion strategy for the next 8-14 months. I will focus on strong projects: BTC, ETH, SOL, AAVE, LINK, SUI, XRP, ENA, ETHFI, LTC, ETC, AVAX, TAO, UNI, along with 8–12 high-risk projects. The PNL target is 1–5$ million, if the market provides opportunities for DCA on dips. ⚠️ *Disclaimer*: This post is for educational purposes only. It is not financial advice. Trading is a high-risk market, make your own decisions at your own responsibility.

$ETC holds a tight $11.20-$11.90 range despite sentiment swinging from 65% to 100%. That's stability with a solid floor. The community bounces back fast too 67% to 100% in just two days shows real engagement. We're at $11.50 on January 27th with both metrics pulling back. Mid-range positioning could be a pause before the next move. The $11.20 support has held before and looks reliable. $ETC shows predictable cycles instead of chaos. Clear patterns, testable support levels, and sentiment that actually matters. For those paying attention, that's exactly what you want, structure you can work with. NFA, always DYOR!

While everyone chased Proof of Stake and scalability, one blockchain stayed true to its original mission. Here’s why that decision is more relevant than ever. TL;DR — Key points The DAO Fork (2016) created Ethereum Classic when the minority refused to reverse transactions, even to recover stolen funds Three Core Principles: Immutability first, Proof of Work consensus, and decentralized governance Why It Matters: In a world of constant pivots, ETC offers stability and predictability for long-term builders In 2026, the cryptocurrency landscape is unrecognizable from just five years ago. Layer-2 solutions dominate headlines, AI-powered trading bots execute millions of transactions per second, and half the major blockchains have pivoted to Proof of Stake. Yet amidst all this innovation and chaos, Ethereum Classic $ETC remains steadfastly the same. Not because its developers are asleep at the wheel, but because consistency is the entire point. This isn’t your typical crypto project trying to “disrupt” or “revolutionize” something every quarter. Ethereum Classic made its philosophical bet in 2016 and hasn’t wavered since. The question is: was that the right bet? The Moment Everything Changed: The DAO Hack of 2016 To understand Ethereum Classic, you need to understand the single most controversial moment in crypto history, a moment that literally split a blockchain in two. June 2016. The DAO (Decentralized Autonomous Organization) had raised $150 million in what was then the largest crowdfunding in history. Then disaster struck: a hacker exploited a vulnerability and drained 3.6 million ETH (worth approximately $50–60 million at the time). The Ethereum community faced an impossible choice: The majority chose intervention. They hard-forked the blockchain, essentially pressing “undo” on the hack. This became what we now call Ethereum (ETH). The minority said absolutely not. They argued that immutability is the ONLY thing that makes a blockchain valuable. If you can reverse transactions when it’s convenient, what’s the point? This minority continued the original chain, which became Ethereum Classic (ETC). This was a fundamental clash of philosophies that couldn’t be reconciled. Three Pillars That Define Ethereum Classic 1. Principle Over Pressure: Immutability is non-negotiable Here’s what makes ETC different: no matter what happens, the blockchain won’t be reversed. Think about that for a second. In traditional finance, if there’s fraud, transactions get reversed all the time. Banks freeze accounts. Governments seize assets. The system is fundamentally mutable. Ethereum Classic says: once a transaction is confirmed, it’s permanent. Forever. That’s the whole point of blockchain, and ETC refuses to compromise on it. Is this extreme? Absolutely. Is it valuable? That depends on what you’re building. 2. Proof of Work: Security through energy While Ethereum moved to Proof of Stake in 2022, Ethereum Classic maintained Proof of Work. This is a strategic choice. Here’s the controversial take: Proof of Stake might be more energy-efficient, but Proof of Work is more censorship-resistant. With PoS, whoever owns the most tokens has the most power. With PoW, you need to keep spending energy every single block. 3. Real Community Unity: Aligned around values The ETC community is small compared to Ethereum’s. But that’s actually a feature. Everyone who chose to stay with ETC in 2016 made a costly decision. They gave up potential gains from ETH’s massive bull runs. They accepted lower liquidity and fewer developers. But they gained something more valuable: alignment. When your community self-selected based on principles rather than profit potential, you get people who genuinely believe in what they’re building. The Real Question: Does Immutability Actually Matter? Here’s where it gets interesting. The crypto world has moved on from the DAO debate. Many newcomers to crypto may not even be aware of this pivotal moment in blockchain history. So why does Ethereum Classic still exist? Because there are use cases where immutability is everything. Imagine you’re building: • Long-term financial instruments that need to function for 50+ years without governance intervention • Censorship-resistant applications where reversal would defeat the entire purpose • Historical records where tampering must be technically impossible, not just difficult • Cross-border settlements where finality matters more than reversibility For these applications, Ethereum Classic’s stubbornness becomes its superpower. The 2026 Landscape: Where does ETC fit? Neither approach is “better” they serve different needs. Ethereum is building the internet of value with maximum flexibility. Ethereum Classic is building digital bedrock with maximum reliability. The crypto ecosystem needs both. What this means for investors and builders in 2026 If you’re evaluating Ethereum Classic in 2026, here’s what matters: For Investors: ETC is not a “get rich quick” play. It’s a bet that immutability and Proof of Work will become more valuable as the crypto ecosystem matures and regulators demand predictability. For Developers: Building on ETC means accepting slower iteration but gaining rock-solid guarantees. Your smart contract will work the same way in 2046 as it does today. For the Ecosystem: ETC serves as a philosophical anchor. When every other project is pivoting to the latest trend, having one major chain that refuses to change reminds us why we built blockchains in the first place. Looking forward: The case for digital bedrock Here’s the thing about foundations: you don’t build them to be flexible. You build them to be permanent. As the crypto industry matures, we’re seeing two parallel trends: 1. Innovation chains that constantly upgrade, experiment, and pivot to stay competitive 2. Foundation chains that prioritize stability, security, and predictability above all else Ethereum Classic has positioned itself firmly in the second category. And as the industry experiences ongoing volatility hacks, rug pulls, and failed experiments boring reliability becomes increasingly compelling. The DAO fork was the test. Ethereum Classic passed by refusing to take it. That decision to prioritize principle over pragmatism created the chain we have today. CONCLUSION Ethereum Classic proved that you can build a sustainable blockchain on principles. In 2026, that’s rarer than you might think. Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments carry significant risk. Always conduct your own research and consult with financial professionals before making investment decisions.

$ETC on the 4H still looks constructive. Price has been consolidating in a rising channel for weeks. The dip below support looks more like a shakeout than real weakness. As long as price can reclaim and hold the channel, upside continuation is in play. That move would signal strength and fresh momentum. Staying patient and optimistic. $ETC just needs confirmation.