Bitget App
Trade smarter
Buy cryptoMarketsTradeFuturesEarnSquareMore
daily_trading_volume_value
market_share59.20%
Current ETH GAS: 0.1-1 gwei
Hot BTC ETF: IBIT
Bitcoin Rainbow Chart : Accumulate
Bitcoin halving: 4th in 2024, 5th in 2028
BTC/USDT$ (0.00%)
banner.title:0(index.bitcoin)
coin_price.total_bitcoin_net_flow_value0
new_userclaim_now
download_appdownload_now
daily_trading_volume_value
market_share59.20%
Current ETH GAS: 0.1-1 gwei
Hot BTC ETF: IBIT
Bitcoin Rainbow Chart : Accumulate
Bitcoin halving: 4th in 2024, 5th in 2028
BTC/USDT$ (0.00%)
banner.title:0(index.bitcoin)
coin_price.total_bitcoin_net_flow_value0
new_userclaim_now
download_appdownload_now
daily_trading_volume_value
market_share59.20%
Current ETH GAS: 0.1-1 gwei
Hot BTC ETF: IBIT
Bitcoin Rainbow Chart : Accumulate
Bitcoin halving: 4th in 2024, 5th in 2028
BTC/USDT$ (0.00%)
banner.title:0(index.bitcoin)
coin_price.total_bitcoin_net_flow_value0
new_userclaim_now
download_appdownload_now
did mastercard stock split? 2014 10-for-1 explained

did mastercard stock split? 2014 10-for-1 explained

This article answers the query "did mastercard stock split" by documenting Mastercard Inc.'s 10-for-1 stock split announced in December 2013 and effected in January 2014, the concurrent dividend in...
2026-01-14 11:40:00
share
Article rating
4.3
109 ratings

Did Mastercard stock split?

<p><strong>Short answer:</strong> Yes — did mastercard stock split. Mastercard Inc. (ticker: MA) announced a 10-for-1 stock split in December 2013 that was effected via a stock dividend in January 2014. The board also approved a sizable increase in the quarterly cash dividend on a pre-split basis and authorized an additional share repurchase program. This article documents the announcement, the mechanics and dates, immediate effects for shareholders, and the recordkeeping entries in historical databases.</p> <h2>Background: Mastercard’s listing and why companies split shares</h2> <p>The query did mastercard stock split refers to a corporate action by Mastercard Inc. (MA) on U.S. markets. Mastercard completed its public listing in 2006 and grew rapidly as electronic payments expanded. By late 2013, Mastercard’s per-share price had risen substantially since the IPO. Companies commonly split shares when the per-share market price becomes relatively high — a split increases the number of outstanding shares and reduces the per-share price while leaving the company’s market capitalization unchanged. Common reasons for splits include improving perceived affordability for retail investors, increasing the number of round-lot shares (for brokerage operational convenience), and broadening the shareholder base.</p> <h2>Announcement (Dec 10, 2013): What the board approved</h2> <p>As of Dec 10, 2013, according to contemporary news reports from The Associated Press and USA Today, Mastercard’s board announced a package of capital-return and shareholder-access measures. These included a 10-for-1 stock split to be effected as a stock dividend, an increase in the quarterly cash dividend on a pre-split basis, and authorization of an additional share repurchase program of up to $3.5 billion.</p> <p>The press coverage at the time addressed the split ratio, the record date, the expected distribution dates, and the company’s rationale. The news reports and later historical data entries form the basis for official split-record listings in databases such as Macrotrends and StockSplitHistory.</p> <h3>Key announcement items</h3> <ul> <li><strong>Split ratio:</strong> 10-for-1 (stock dividend)</li> <li><strong>Board announcement date:</strong> December 10, 2013</li> <li><strong>Record date:</strong> reported as close of business January 9, 2014 (per AP/USA Today reporting)</li> <li><strong>Scheduled distribution / effective date:</strong> contemporary news reports scheduled distribution around January 21, 2014; several historical databases list the effective date as January 22, 2014</li> <li><strong>Quarterly cash dividend:</strong> board approved an increase on a pre-split basis (reported as $1.10 per share on a pre-split basis — an increase representing a material raise compared with the prior quarterly payout)</li> <li><strong>Buyback authorization:</strong> additional repurchase program authorization up to $3.5 billion</li> </ul> <h2>Effective date and mechanics of the split</h2> <p>When people ask "did mastercard stock split" they typically want to know both whether it occurred and how it was carried out. The split was implemented as a stock dividend. In practical terms, each shareholder of record on the record date received nine additional shares for every share they held, producing a 10-for-1 increase in the number of outstanding shares.</p> <p>Mechanically: the company declared a stock dividend equal to nine additional shares for each share outstanding. For every 1 pre-split share, shareholders ended up with 10 post-split shares. The per-share market price adjusted on the applicable ex-distribution/trading date to reflect the larger share count; market capitalization remained effectively unchanged, aside from ordinary market fluctuations.</p> <p>There is a minor variance in reported dates across sources: contemporary news reports (AP / USA Today) cited a distribution scheduled around Jan 21, 2014 and recorded the record date as Jan 9, 2014. Historical databases such as Macrotrends and StockSplitHistory commonly list Jan 22, 2014 as the effective split date. Both sets of reports refer to the same corporate action, and the one-day reporting discrepancy is typical when press releases set a distribution window and exchanges publish final processing dates.</p> <h2>Rationale given by Mastercard management</h2> <p>In its announcement, Mastercard’s board and management framed the split as a way to make the stock more accessible to individual investors by lowering the nominal per-share price and increasing the number of shares outstanding. The company also presented the move alongside a larger dividend and a renewed share-repurchase authorization, highlighting a strategy to return capital to shareholders while broadening potential investor participation. Management emphasized that these actions were consistent with long-term capital allocation priorities.</p> <h2>Market reaction and immediate effects</h2> <p>Following the Dec 10, 2013 announcement, market publications reported immediate investor interest. In after-hours trading and in the days surrounding the announcement, shares reacted to the combined news of the split, the dividend increase, and the buyback authorization. A split by itself does not change a company’s fundamentals or its market capitalization, but it can change liquidity characteristics and investor perception. Analysts and financial press commented on the share-accessibility rationale and noted the generous buyback authorization in the context of Mastercard’s cash flows and margin profile at the time.</p> <p>Practical immediate effects for shareholders included:</p> <ul> <li>Share quantity increased tenfold for each position recorded on the record date.</li> <li>Per-share market price adjusted to reflect the increased share count (roughly divided by 10 in price).</li> <li>Total holding value held constant aside from market movements; tax basis and per-share cost basis were adjusted per broker records.</li> </ul> <h2>Related corporate actions announced with the split</h2> <p>The split was announced as part of a package of shareholder-friendly moves. Key related items included:</p> <ul> <li><strong>Dividend increase (pre-split basis):</strong> The board approved a substantial increase in the quarterly cash dividend on a pre-split basis, reported in news coverage as raising the quarterly cash dividend to $1.10 per share on a pre-split basis. After the split, dividend amounts per share were adjusted proportionally to reflect the 10-for-1 split.</li> <li><strong>Share repurchase authorization:</strong> Mastercard authorized an additional repurchase program of up to $3.5 billion, signaling management’s intent to continue returning excess cash to shareholders via buybacks.</li> </ul> <p>Both actions reinforced the company’s capital-return policy and were highlighted by the financial press as complementary to the split.</p> <h2>Historical context and significance</h2> <p>Did Mastercard stock split more than once? No. This 10-for-1 action in January 2014 was the first stock split by Mastercard since its public listing. It remains the only split recorded for MA in major split-history compilations. The split came after several years of significant share-price appreciation following the company’s 2006 IPO, and it aligned Mastercard with a cohort of mature, high-priced technology and payments companies that occasionally split shares to broaden access.</p> <p>Comparisons with peers: Payment-network peers and other technology companies have periodically implemented splits to improve retail investor accessibility. Visa Inc., for example, executed its own split(s) in later years. These operational decisions are generally corporate-governance choices reflecting a company’s views on investor access and capital allocation, not changes in underlying fundamentals.</p> <h2>Impact on shareholders and share count — practical examples</h2> <p>Shareholders asked "did mastercard stock split" because they wanted to know how their holdings would change. Below are illustrative examples and practical notes (hypothetical numbers are used for clarity):</p> <ul> <li>If you owned 100 shares of Mastercard before the split, after the 10-for-1 split you held 1,000 shares. If the pre-split price was $400 per share, a 10-for-1 split would, all else equal, convert the price to approximately $40 per share post-split. Your total holding value remained around $40,000, not counting market moves.</li> <li>Brokerage accounts normally adjusted share counts automatically; fractional shares created by corporate actions were handled per the broker’s practice (cash-in-lieu or rounding), but most holders ended up with whole additional shares under this particular 10-for-1 structure because the ratio multiplied holdings by an integer.</li> <li>Tax treatment: stock splits generally do not create a taxable event by themselves in the U.S. Instead, they change cost basis per share. Investors should consult tax guidance or a tax advisor for personal tax implications. This article does not provide tax advice.</li> </ul> <h2>Data and records: official split entry and database listings</h2> <p>Multiple financial databases and historical trackers record the split and its parameters. The key data points recorded across sources are:</p> <table border="1" cellpadding="6" cellspacing="0"> <thead> <tr> <th>Event</th> <th>Value</th> </tr> </thead> <tbody> <tr> <td>Split ratio</td> <td>10-for-1 (stock dividend)</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Board announcement</td> <td>Dec 10, 2013 (reported by AP / USA Today / RTTNews)</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Record date (reported)</td> <td>Jan 9, 2014 (reported in contemporary press)</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Distribution / effective date (reported)</td> <td>Scheduled around Jan 21, 2014 (press); Jan 22, 2014 listed by Macrotrends / StockSplitHistory</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Dividend change (pre-split)</td> <td>Increase to $1.10 quarterly on a pre-split basis (reported)</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Buyback authorization</td> <td>Additional authorization up to $3.5 billion</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p>As noted above, slight discrepancies in the exact distribution date exist between press reports and later database entries; both refer to the same corporate action and are consistent in ratio and record-date reporting.</p> <h2>Where the authoritative details come from</h2> <p>Primary contemporary coverage for the split includes Associated Press / USA Today articles published on and around December 10, 2013 that reported on the board action and provided key dates. Financial news wires such as RTTNews and historical financial-data compilations like Macrotrends, CompaniesMarketCap, MLQ.ai, and StockSplitHistory list the split and provide the final recorded effective date (often listed as January 22, 2014). The Motley Fool and other analyst outlets provided commentary and context at the time of announcement and in subsequent write-ups.</p> <p>Example reporting-note language used in contemporary articles: "As of Dec 10, 2013, according to The Associated Press, Mastercard’s board approved a 10-for-1 split to be distributed to shareholders of record on Jan 9, 2014, with share distribution scheduled around Jan 21, 2014." Historical databases later recorded Jan 22, 2014 as the effective date in their split-history tables.</p> <h2>Why some sources list Jan 21 and others Jan 22, 2014</h2> <p>The small reporting difference around Jan 21 vs Jan 22, 2014 stems from the way corporate actions are announced and processed. Press reports commonly cite the planned distribution schedule provided by company releases. Exchanges and settlement systems subsequently publish the final processed trade dates, and historical databases compile those final processing dates. Both types of sources are consistent on the ratio, record date, and corporate-action intent; the one-day difference is an administrative timing nuance rather than a substantive disagreement about the split itself.</p> <h2>FAQ: common investor questions about "did mastercard stock split"</h2> <h3>Q: Did Mastercard stock split more than once?</h3> <p>A: No. The 10-for-1 split in January 2014 is the only recorded split for Mastercard since its 2006 IPO, per major split-history databases and contemporary press coverage.</p> <h3>Q: Did Mastercard stock split affect market cap?</h3> <p>A: No. The split increased the number of shares and reduced the per-share price proportionally; the company’s market capitalization remained effectively unchanged at the moment of the split, aside from normal market price movements.</p> <h3>Q: Did Mastercard stock split change my dividends?</h3> <p>A: The board increased the quarterly cash dividend on a pre-split basis. After the split, per-share dividend amounts were adjusted proportional to the split ratio. The total dividend income for each shareholder, absent other changes, was not reduced by the split itself.</p> <h3>Q: How did brokers handle the split?</h3> <p>A: Brokers automatically adjusted holdings for customers who held shares on the record date. Because the split ratio multiplied holdings by an integer (10x), fractional shares were generally not an issue for whole-share holders; any minor fractional-share situations were handled according to broker policies.</p> <h2>Historical record and database citations (sources used)</h2> <p>The following sources documented the event and were used to compile this article. Each source reported the board action, split ratio, key dates, and the related dividend and buyback items. Reporting dates are included to preserve time context:</p> <ul> <li>Associated Press / USA Today — reporting published Dec 10, 2013 (reported the board approval, 10-for-1 split, record date Jan 9, 2014, and distribution scheduled around Jan 21, 2014)</li> <li>RTTNews — company-announcement coverage and mechanics</li> <li>Macrotrends — historical split-data listing (records split and lists effective date commonly as Jan 22, 2014)</li> <li>StockSplitHistory — split record and ratio (10:1) listing</li> <li>CompaniesMarketCap / MLQ.ai / The Motley Fool — supplementary summaries, commentary, and context</li> </ul> <p>Note: some contemporary press reports and later database entries differ by a day on the final distribution date (reporting cited Jan 21 vs database entries listing Jan 22, 2014). Both sets of records consistently report the 10-for-1 ratio and the Jan 9, 2014 record date cited in press releases.</p> <h2>What this meant for investment accessibility and corporate signaling</h2> <p>Stock splits do not change company fundamentals, but they can influence investor behavior and market microstructure. By effectively lowering the per-share price, Mastercard made smaller-lot purchases more accessible to retail investors and simplified share-lot size for brokerage operations. The split combined with a dividend increase and buyback authorization also signaled management confidence in cash generation and a willingness to return capital to owners.</p> <p>For institutional investors, the split had limited strategic impact. For retail investors, however, post-split per-share pricing sometimes enables easier participation in smaller dollar amounts and can increase visible liquidity at lower per-share price points.</p> <h2>Practical checklist for shareholders affected by the split</h2> <ol> <li>Confirm your broker adjusted the share count on or after the distribution date.</li> <li>Check your per-share cost basis as recorded by your broker for tax records (the cost basis per share typically is divided by the split factor).</li> <li>Review the corporate-action notice from Mastercard or your broker for any cash-in-lieu instructions if fractional shares arose (not common in this integer-ratio split).</li> <li>Remember the split itself is generally not a taxable event; consult a tax advisor for specifics to your situation.</li> </ol> <h2>See also</h2> <ul> <li>Stock split (general concepts)</li> <li>Share buybacks and repurchases</li> <li>Dividend policy basics</li> <li>Mastercard (company) — corporate overview</li> <li>Visa stock split — for peer comparison</li> </ul> <h2>References and reporting dates</h2> <p>Key reporting and database entries used to assemble the facts in this article (dates indicate when the reporting or entry was published or commonly cited):</p> <ul> <li>Associated Press / USA Today — reporting published Dec 10, 2013 (announced 10-for-1 split; reported record date Jan 9, 2014; scheduled distribution around Jan 21, 2014)</li> <li>RTTNews — contemporaneous coverage of the announcement (Dec 2013)</li> <li>Macrotrends — historical split-data listing (lists effective date Jan 22, 2014 in its split history table)</li> <li>StockSplitHistory — split listing and ratio (10:1)</li> <li>CompaniesMarketCap / MLQ.ai / The Motley Fool — supplementary summaries and commentary</li> </ul> <p>As noted earlier: contemporary press reports cited Jan 21, 2014 as a scheduled distribution date while historical databases list Jan 22, 2014 as the processed effective date. Both descriptions refer to the same corporate action: a 10-for-1 split announced Dec 10, 2013, with a Jan 9, 2014 record date and distribution in the Jan 21–22, 2014 window.</p> <h2>Final notes and how Bitget can help you track market events</h2> <p>Did mastercard stock split is a straightforward historical question with a clear answer: yes, Mastercard executed a 10-for-1 stock split in January 2014. If you track corporate actions and want consolidated access to market data, dividend records, and split histories for public companies, platforms that offer organized corporate-action feeds and robust charting can help you follow such events and understand their implications.</p> <p>Explore Bitget’s market data tools and watchlists to monitor corporate actions, stock histories, and other corporate events for companies you follow. Bitget provides user-friendly interfaces for tracking price histories and corporate announcements — useful when you want to see how actions like stock splits, dividends, and buybacks have played out over time. Learn more about Bitget’s features directly in the platform to stay informed and organized.</p> <footer> <h3>Article metadata</h3> <p>This article addressed the keyword <strong>did mastercard stock split</strong> and documented the 10-for-1 stock split announced Dec 10, 2013 and effected around Jan 21–22, 2014, the related dividend increase (pre-split $1.10 quarterly reported), and the $3.5 billion buyback authorization. Reporting sources include Associated Press / USA Today (Dec 10, 2013), RTTNews (Dec 2013), Macrotrends (split history entry), StockSplitHistory, CompaniesMarketCap, MLQ.ai, and The Motley Fool.</p> <p><em>Note:</em> This article is factual and informational only. It does not provide investment advice. For personal tax or investment guidance, consult a qualified professional.</p> </footer>
The content above has been sourced from the internet and generated using AI. For high-quality content, please visit Bitget Academy.
Buy crypto for $10
Buy now!

Trending assets

Assets with the largest change in unique page views on the Bitget website over the past 24 hours.

Popular cryptocurrencies

A selection of the top 12 cryptocurrencies by market cap.
© 2025 Bitget