Cena Infrared sol coinIr

✦🔥 $IR: Volume Exploding, Price Dropping — Smart Money Loading or Trap Money Dying? 💥 ✍️ By ProfUseey | Voice of Market Awareness 🌍 ━━ 💭 THE HOOK — “Price moves fast. Psychology moves faster.” ━━ $IR once carved its shock-floor from $0.3499 → $0.0150, wiping out uninterested buyers and weak hands. Then stability returned. Confidence rebuilt. Price compressed into a narrow range. But now — the tone has changed. 📉 Price is slipping again. 🔥 Volume is surging aggressively. And whenever volume expands while price weakens, the market asks only one question: 💭 Is fear flushing weak hands — or is accumulation failing? ⭕ Updated Technical Snapshot (4H — IR/USDT on Bitget) 📊 • Current Price: ~$0.2505 • 24h High / Low: $0.27965 – $0.23373 • 24h Volume: ~366M IR (abnormal spike) • Turnover: ~$98.52M USDT ⭕ Indicator Reality — What the Chart Is ACTUALLY Saying 🧠 📍 Bollinger Bands (Volatility Signal): • Middle Band ≈ 0.2550 • Upper Band ≈ 0.2949 • Lower Band ≈ 0.2152 👉 Price is slipping below the middle band, suggesting loss of bullish control and volatility expansion. 📍 Parabolic SAR (Trend Pressure): • SAR dots positioned above price 👉 Confirms short-term bearish pressure remains active. 📍 MACD (Momentum Shift): • Histogram turning negative • Momentum flattening after expansion 👉 Indicates bullish energy is weakening, not accelerating. 🧠 Street Translation: 👉 This is no longer calm accumulation. 👉 This is pressure testing conviction. ⭕ Street Psychology — Who’s Backing Down & Who’s Absorbing? ⚖️ As price slides toward the lower Bollinger range: 1️⃣ Retail fear resurfaces — red candles trigger panic 2️⃣ Short-term traders exit — momentum fades 3️⃣ Strong hands face a decision — defend or abandon $0.23–$0.21 zone This isn’t randomness. It’s psychological sorting. 💭 “Charts show movement. Psychology shows intention.” ⭕ Bull vs Bear — The Battle Zone Is CLEAR ⚔️ 🐂 BULL CASE — Controlled Absorption • Price holds above $0.23 – $0.21 (lower Bollinger zone) • Volume spike without sharp breakdown = absorption • SAR flip + reclaim of $0.26 restores structure 📈 Bull Interpretation: 👉 Fear becomes liquidity. 👉 Weak hands exit — strong hands reload. 🐻 BEAR CASE — Distribution Breakdown • Clean loss of $0.23 • Price walks the lower Bollinger band • MACD momentum continues negative 📉 Bear Interpretation: 👉 Volume confirms selling dominance, not smart loading. 👉 Slide toward $0.20 and below becomes probable. ⭕ ProfUseey Strategy — Trade Phases, Not Emotions 🎯 I’m not chasing candles. I’m reading reaction to pressure. 💡 Key Zones I’m Watching: • Demand Zone: $0.23 – $0.21 • Rejection Zone: $0.26 – $0.28 • Volatility Signal: Bollinger expansion direction • Confirmation: SAR flip + MACD stabilization 📌 Move slow. 📌 Respect volatility. 📌 Let structure speak first. ⭕ Street Debate — Only Thinkers Reply 💥 Enough guessing. Let’s debate structure vs emotion. 💭 1. Is $IR respecting the lower Bollinger band — or preparing to break it? 💭 2. Does the volume spike represent absorption or capitulation? 💭 3. Your current stance: 👉 BUY near $0.23–$0.21 👉 WAIT for SAR + Bollinger reclaim above $0.26 👉 STAY OUT until momentum resets 👇 Drop your logic + indicator-based reasoning below. No hype. No vibes. Just data. ❤️ CTA — The ProfUseey Way 💬 Comment your stance on $IR 🔁 Share this to wake up the crypto streets 👥 Follow @ProfUseey — where psychology meets structure Because when ProfUseey speaks phases — Bitget listens. 🔥 💬 Final Note: “You don’t win by predicting direction. You win by understanding pressure.” 💯 #BitgetInsight #ProfUseeyAlwaysDifferent #IR $IR

Newly Listed RTX/USDT 2025/12/19 +34.36% (2.6468) VOOI/USDT 2025/12/18 +0.22% (0.04074) IR/USDT 2025/12/17 -11.29% (0.24157) THQ/USDT 2025/12/16 +0.12% (0.04031) MAGMA/USDT 2025/12/16 +0.82% (0.13472) VSN/USDT 2025/12/12 +0.13% (0.08240) RAVE/USDT 2025/12/12 -11.22% (0.37395) CYS/USDT 2025/12/11 +22.22% (0.32254) ALMANAK/USDT 2025/12/11 +0.1% (0.00978) FRAX/USDT 2025/12/11 +5.51% (0.6394) $RTX $VOOI $IR

Infrared ( $IR ) rose 25.4% over the last 24h, defying a 1.68% dip in the broader crypto market. Here are the main factors: Token Launch Momentum – Post-TGE volatility and exchange listings fueled speculative buying. Airdrop Campaigns – Active rewards programs on big and small exchanges incentivized trading volume. Berachain Hype – IR’s role in Berachain’s liquidity ecosystem attracted early adopters. Deep Dive 1. Token Launch Momentum (Bullish Impact) Overview: IR’s Token Generation Event (TGE) concluded on December 17, followed by listings on different exchanges, and others by December 19. The token debuted at ~$0.05 and surged to $0.258 as of December 19, partly due to low initial liquidity amplifying price swings. What this means: New listings often trigger volatility as traders speculate on price discovery. IR’s 24h trading volume of $118.5M (up 11.2%) confirms heightened activity. However, the top 10 holders control 40% of supply , raising risks of concentrated sell-offs. What to watch: Sustained volume above $100M and whether IR holds above its pivot point of $0.244. 2. Airdrop Incentives (Mixed Impact) Overview: Major platforms are running airdrop campaigns until December 24, requiring users to trade IR/USDT pairs or hold tokens to earn rewards. What this means: These programs artificially inflate short-term demand – for example, With one providing $50K reward pool likely contributed to IR’s 160% rally noted in a tweet. However, post-campaign sell-offs are common if participants dump tokens after claiming rewards. What to watch: Token claims after December 24 and exchange outflow metrics. 3. Berachain Ecosystem Integration (Bullish Impact) Overview: IR serves as the liquidity backbone for Berachain’s Proof of Liquidity (PoL) network, offering staking and yield vaults. With Bitcoin dominance at 59.3%, investors may be rotating into altcoins tied to niche ecosystems like Berachain. What this means: IR’s utility in automating staking rewards and governance (via iBGT/iBERA tokens) positions it as a bet on Berachain’s adoption. The project’s fully diluted valuation ($193M) suggests traders are pricing in future growth despite IR’s 30-day price still being down 24.4%. What to watch: Berachain’s TVL growth and IR’s staking participation rates. Conclusion IR’s surge reflects a mix of speculative trading around its TGE, airdrop-driven volume, and optimism about its role in Berachain’s DeFi stack. While bullish in the short term, the token’s high holder concentration and post-campaign risks warrant caution. Key watch: Can IR maintain momentum after the December 24 airdrop deadline, or will profit-taking reverse gains?

$IR what a rubbish

Liquidity as Structure, Not Just Incentive When I look at Infrared Finance, I see it mainly as an answer to a structural problem inside Berachain itself. Proof of Liquidity was meant to align capital, security, and incentives, but in reality it creates friction very fast. Rewards are strong, but they are often illiquid. Governance is earned, but it is not easy to use. Participation assumes you understand validator-level mechanics. Infrared is not trying to change Proof of Liquidity. What it does is remove those frictions by wrapping everything in infrastructure that feels simple, liquid, and easy to plug into DeFi, without breaking the original incentive design. Instead of forcing users to think like validators or incentive engineers, Infrared hides that complexity. BERA staking, BGT rewards, validator operations, and PoL vault routing are all bundled into systems that work with one click. Capital stays productive the whole time. When BERA is staked, it becomes liquid exposure while still earning validator yield. When BGT is earned through PoL actions, it does not get stuck. It becomes usable. Assets that would normally be locked or soulbound now move through DeFi without damaging Berachain’s incentive structure. This is where Infrared quietly turns Proof of Liquidity from something static into something that compounds continuously. This becomes very clear when you look at the liquid assets themselves. Staked BERA turns into iBERA on a one-to-one basis. You keep the base yield, but you can now use it elsewhere. BGT earned through PoL becomes iBGT, also backed one-to-one, but it cannot be redeemed. Instead, it compounds when deposited into Infrared vaults. The loop feeds itself. Liquidity creates governance, governance directs incentives, and incentives deepen liquidity. None of this requires running a validator, but users still earn validator rewards and PoL emissions. Incentives That Accumulate Over Time Above all of this sits IR, the governance token that ties everything together. Its design clearly favors accumulation over leakage. When IR is staked into sIR, holders gain governance power and earn from protocol fees, especially fees tied to iBGT activity. These fees are not just paid out. They are used to buy IR from the market and send it back to sIR stakers. That creates steady buy pressure instead of temporary emissions. There is another layer aimed at protocols themselves. Apps can hold IR, stake it into special vaults, and directly access PoL rewards. This turns IR into an incentive routing asset, not just a voting token. Over time, this pushes IR away from short-term speculation and toward long-term strategic value inside Berachain. Long-term alignment is reinforced by the Red Fund. Fees are used to buy IR, lock it for twelve months, and later release it as PoL incentives after early emissions end. This delays supply and reduces constant sell pressure. Distribution follows the same logic. Twenty percent of the ecosystem allocation unlocks at launch, with the rest vesting over two years. Team members, investors, and Build-a-Bera allocations face a one-year cliff, then a small unlock, followed by linear vesting. The Build-a-Bera allocation is meant to be held indefinitely. Where Structure Meets the Market This patient structure contrasts with how IR trades right now. At the time I looked, IR was around 0.2586, down roughly five percent in a day. On the one-hour and fifteen-minute charts, price is below the short-term moving averages, and those averages are sloping downward. That usually means short-term bearish momentum, not sideways consolidation. Momentum indicators support that view. RSI on short timeframes is below fifty, showing sellers still control price, but not at full panic levels. MACD is below its signal line, with red bars expanding, which points to downside acceleration. Parabolic SAR is still above price, so there is no confirmed trend reversal yet. Volatility gives a bit more nuance. Price is hugging the lower Bollinger Band around 0.256, which usually happens during trend continuation, not immediate reversals. At the same time, Stochastic RSI is deeply oversold, which often comes before short-term relief bounces. That tells me exhaustion risk is building, even if the trend has not flipped. Volume makes things clearer. On-Balance Volume has dropped with price, meaning real selling is happening. Looking deeper, large traders were net buyers, absorbing supply, while medium and small traders were net sellers. Overall net flow is still negative, but whales are clearly positioning while the broader market exits. A System Still Taking Shape From a fundamental angle, this behavior makes sense. IR’s market cap is about 53 million dollars, which is small-cap territory and naturally volatile. Circulating supply is only about twenty percent of the total, which makes price sensitive and raises future dilution concerns. Trading volume compared to market cap is extremely high, showing that most activity right now is speculative, not long-term holding. Price discovery is still unresolved. Both the all-time high around 0.35 and the all-time low around 0.184 happened within the same week. Support currently sits near 0.250, while resistance is near 0.272. Losing support could push price toward the psychological 0.20 area. Reclaiming resistance would be the first step toward breaking the bearish structure. A short-term mean reversion bounce: With price pressing the lower Bollinger Band near 0.256, Stochastic RSI deeply oversold, and whales absorbing supply, I see room for a reflex bounce even inside a bearish trend. I would look to enter between roughly 0.248 and 0.255, with the idea invalidated if price closes below 0.242. The first target would be around 0.272, and if momentum follows through, a push into the 0.288 to 0.295 zone is possible over a few days. If price clearly breaks and holds below 0.250, that would confirm continuation lower. In that case, I would wait patiently for price to move into the 0.215 to 0.225 area, where value and prior interest align. This setup fails if price reclaims 0.260 with strong volume. The downside target would sit near 0.20, which lines up with both psychology and prior lows, and this would likely play out over one to three weeks. A trend shift play: IR already printed its all-time high around 0.35 during early price discovery. If price can close and hold above that level, it would signal a new expansion phase. I would only enter after confirmation, around 0.36 to 0.38, and exit if price falls back below 0.33. In that scenario, upside could extend first toward 0.48 and then toward 0.62 over several weeks. A mid-term accumulation idea: With only about twenty percent of supply circulating, active buybacks, locked incentives, and delayed emissions, I see the 0.22 to 0.30 range as a zone to slowly build a position, not trade actively. This play is not invalidated by price but by fundamentals, meaning failure of Infrared adoption. If the thesis holds, a move toward 0.75 to 0.90 over several months becomes realistic. The asymmetric expansion case: A move above one dollar would put IR at a market cap that is not unreasonable for core infrastructure in a successful ecosystem. This outcome requires Berachain adoption, Infrared becoming default PoL routing, and buybacks reducing liquid supply. I would want core exposure built below 0.40, add on strength above 0.62, and step aside if price loses 0.45 after breaking out. If momentum takes over, one dollar is the first target, with possible extension toward 1.25 to 1.50 over the long term. $IR