Preço de USDCUSDC

Samsung Just Became the Biggest Name in the Stablecoin Race I've argued all week that stablecoins get won on distribution, not technology. Then Samsung walks in. At Galaxy Unpacked, it said Samsung Wallet will support stablecoins natively, putting digital dollars on the phones of millions of Galaxy owners. Here's why the phone part matters so much. Until now, using stablecoins meant downloading a crypto app, and most people simply never will. Putting them inside a wallet that already holds your cards, IDs, and car keys removes the one step that kills adoption. No new app, no new habit. Compare that to what I wrote about Tether reaching 500 million wallets, mostly through phones in developing markets. Samsung wants that same path, except pre-installed. That's a serious shortcut. But let's stay honest. Samsung named no issuer, no launch date, and no markets. No word on whether it's USDT, USDC, 🟠 $BTC or something else entirely. Right now this is a slide, not a product. Personally, I still think it's the most important stablecoin news of the week. Not because of what shipped, but because of who said it. When phone makers move, Visa and Circle have to move faster. 📱👀

AFX Cross Chain Bridge Exploited, $24.15M USDC Stolen The Arbitrum ecosystem protocol AFX has suffered a major security breach after its cross chain bridge was exploited, resulting in the theft of approximately 24.15 million USDC. • Around 24.15 million USDC has been stolen from the AFX operated cross chain bridge. • Blockchain security firm Blockaid is working with the Arbitrum team and the affected protocol to investigate the attack and help freeze the stolen funds. • Offchain Labs co founder Steven Goldfeder confirmed the exploit originated from a third party protocol. • Arbitrum's native bridge has not been compromised and remains unaffected. • The Arbitrum team is coordinating with the affected protocol and will provide further updates as the investigation continues. The incident underscores the ongoing security risks surrounding third party cross chain infrastructure, even when the underlying

🇰🇷 Circle Expands in South Korea Circle has signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with South Korea's Kakao Group to explore blockchain-based payment infrastructure and $USDC integration across Korea. The partnership will focus on: • Expanding USDC adoption for payments and digital finance. • Building blockchain payment solutions for businesses and consumers. • Leveraging Kakao's massive ecosystem, including fintech and digital services. South Korea emerging as one of Asia's largest crypto markets, this collaboration could accelerate stablecoin adoption and strengthen real-world blockchain payments.

The crypto market has once again been reminded that security is just as important as profits. A major exploit has reportedly hit the AFX Bridge, resulting in the loss of approximately $24.15 million in USDC. The attacker is believed to have moved the stolen funds across networks and converted a large portion into ETH, making the incident one of the biggest DeFi security events of the week. Before panic spreads, it's important to understand one thing. AFX is NOT a centralized exchange. It is a cross-chain bridge. A bridge allows users to transfer digital assets from one blockchain to another without selling their tokens. For example, moving USDC from Arbitrum to Ethereum or another supported network. Bridges play a crucial role in the DeFi ecosystem because they connect different blockchains and improve liquidity across networks. However, they also manage large amounts of locked assets, making them one of the most attractive targets for hackers. According to the available reports, the exploit targeted the AFX Bridge infrastructure rather than the blockchain itself. This means the issue was with the bridge protocol—not with Ethereum, Arbitrum, or the underlying blockchains. Incidents like this highlight one of the biggest challenges in decentralized finance. Innovation is growing rapidly, but security must grow even faster. Every time a major bridge is exploited, investors become more cautious, and trust in the affected protocol can decline until the issue is fully investigated and addressed. If you're using any DeFi bridge, there are a few important habits worth following. Always verify you're using the official website. Avoid moving large amounts through newly launched protocols that haven't built a strong security record. Pay attention to security audits, protocol updates, and official announcements before bridging funds. Diversifying where you store and move your assets can also reduce risk. While this exploit is significant, it's also a reminder that not every crypto security incident affects the entire market equally. Bitcoin, Ethereum, and major blockchains continue to operate normally. The exploit was specific to the AFX Bridge protocol. The AFX team has paused bridge operations while investigating the incident and working to understand exactly how the attack occurred. The crypto industry has faced similar challenges before, and each incident pushes developers to strengthen security standards for future protocols. Security is no longer just a technical issue. It's one of the biggest factors that determines whether users trust a project with their capital. As DeFi continues to expand, protecting user funds will remain one of the industry's highest priorities. What are your thoughts on bridge security? Do you think cross-chain bridges are still too risky, or will stronger security make them safer over time? 💬 Share your opinion below.

How to Move Assets From Ethereum to TON (Without a Bridge) I needed to move USDC from Ethereum into TON a while back. My first instinct was the old routine — find a bridge, lock the asset, wait, hope nothing goes wrong on the other side. Didn't end up needing any of that. 🧩 Why I skipped the bridge search STONfi now supports live cross-chain swaps directly in its app, connecting TON with Ethereum and a few other EVM chains. No separate bridge interface, no wrapped-asset guesswork. > I stopped thinking "I need to bridge this" and started thinking "I just need to swap this." 🔍 How it's actually different underneath Instead of locking funds in a shared vault and minting a wrapped copy, Omniston routes the swap through resolvers competing to fill it with their own liquidity, settled via paired Hashed Timelock Contracts. Either both sides complete, or neither does — no permanent vault sitting there as a single point of failure. 🚀 What I actually did 1. Connected my Ethereum wallet to the STONfi app 2. Selected Ethereum as source, TON as destination 3. Chose USDC in, USDT out 4. Reviewed the quote and fees before confirming 5. Confirmed, let the contracts settle both sides 6. Checked my TON wallet for the landed asset That was it. No second manual step on the TON side, no wrapped token to swap again afterward. 💭 What I'd check before you try it - Confirm you're on the official STONfi interface - Double-check both token contract addresses - Review quoted output and fees before signing - Test with a small amount first if moving anything meaningful Expected this to feel like a workaround stitched together. It didn't — felt like one swap with a different starting chain. Have you moved assets between Ethereum and TON yet? What tripped you up? 👇 Not financial advice — just my own experience. DYOR. $BTC $ETH