Hyperliquid Founder Addresses Revenue Prioritization Concerns
- Jeff Yan addresses trader concerns about Hyperliquid’s revenue model.
- Hyperliquid focuses on benefiting users through ADL.
- Potential profitability impact for users highlighted.
Hyperliquid prioritizes revenue over trader concerns by employing an Automatic Deleveraging (ADL) mechanism that shifts profits to users and mitigates risk. Founder Jeff Yan clarified the model, emphasizing its impact, including token buybacks worth $645 million.
Jeff Yan, founder of Hyperliquid , recently clarified the platform’s approach to revenue, addressing trader concerns regarding its revenue model. Yan emphasized that Hyperliquid aims to benefit users through its Automatic Deleveraging (ADL) mechanism.
Amid questions about Hyperliquid’s focus on protocol revenue over traders, this clarification holds significance for users and market observers. The response showcases transparency over profit distribution.
The recent focus by Hyperliquid on its revenue model sparked responses, especially concerning the Automatic Deleveraging mechanism. Jeff Yan clarified that this model generates profits while mitigating risks, benefiting users with net financial gains.
In his statements, Yan addressed misconceptions that suggested Hyperliquid prioritized protocol revenue. He used platforms like X to emphasize that their mechanism is designed for user profit, particularly during high liquidation events.
Immediate market reactions were mixed, with some praising the platform’s transparency and others concerned about potential risk exposure. Hyperliquid’s decisions continue to impact user confidence and the broader DeFi ecosystem.
“The ADL event on October 10th generated hundreds of millions of dollars in net profits for users.” — Jeff Yan, Founder, Hyperliquid
Financial implications involve potential shifts in user trust and investment strategies. The platform’s mechanisms could affect DeFi market stability and user engagement, particularly with the ongoing focus on profit distribution.
With Hyperliquid’s stance clarified, industry participants are keenly observing the financial and technological outcomes. Historical trends suggest that similar mechanisms have led to user skepticism but also potential profitability, indicating a foundational shift in how DeFi platforms engage traders.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
Ethereum News Today: Hayes: Most L1s Are Fragile, Only Ethereum and Solana Will Endure
- Arthur Hayes warns most L1 blockchains outside Ethereum and Solana face collapse due to lack of utility and structural viability. - He criticizes projects like Monad for high FDV and low float, predicting 99% crashes when early investors unlock tokens. - Ethereum's modular architecture and Solana's speed-positioned for 2026 dominance-contrast with fragmented L2 ecosystems. - Hayes backs privacy coins like Zcash, citing institutional interest and potential growth from global liquidity expansion. - He fore

XRP News Today: Ripple’s Multiple Revenue Streams Reduce XRP Selling Pressure and Enhance Its Value
- Ripple's CTO David Schwartz revealed RLUSD and diversified revenue streams reduce XRP sales dependency, eliminating structural price pressure. - Previously, XRP sales funded operations, creating a self-reinforcing cycle of price declines through forced token liquidations. - RLUSD coexists with XRP as a stable liquidity tool, while enterprise solutions generate recurring income independent of token reserves. - This shift positions XRP as a utility asset rather than a cash-flow tool, with analysts noting r

21Shares Confirms TOXR Launch as XRP ETF Inflows Rise Across the Expanding U.S. Market

Brazil’s São Paulo to Launch Blockchain-Based Microloan Program for Farmers
