The Fantom community has passed the first proposal related to the Sonic chain, supporting a 1:1 exchange between FTM and S tokens
The Fantom Foundation announced on platform X that the community has voted in favor of its first proposal for the upcoming Sonic chain, with a support rate of 99%. FTM will be compatible with Sonic's new token S and achieve a 1:1 exchange at launch. Previous news showed that members of the Fantom governance forum initiated a series of governance proposals about the Sonic network, currently soliciting feedback from the community on proposed changes, plans, and initiatives. The proposal pointed out that Sonic will be a brand-new L1 chain and will bridge to chains like Ethereum through native L2 cross-chain. According to the results of the first governance vote, FTM holders will be able to migrate to Sonic's native token S at a 1:1 ratio when Sonic is created.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
After bitcoin returns to $90,000, is Christmas or a Christmas crash coming next?
This Thanksgiving, we are grateful for bitcoin returning to $90,000.

Bitcoin security reaches a historic high, but miner revenue drops to a historic low. Where will mining companies find new sources of income?
The current paradox of the Bitcoin network is particularly striking: while the protocol layer has never been more secure due to high hash power, the underlying mining industry is facing pressure from capital liquidation and consolidation.

What are the privacy messaging apps Session and SimpleX donated by Vitalik?
Why did Vitalik take action? From content encryption to metadata privacy.

The covert war escalates: Hyperliquid faces a "kamikaze" attack, but the real battle may have just begun
The attacker incurred a loss of 3 million in a "suicidal" attack, but may have achieved breakeven through external hedging. This appears more like a low-cost "stress test" targeting the protocol's defensive capabilities.
