Prezzo di Strike

$STRK – Liquidation Map (7 days) – Index ~0.0468 🧭 STRK favors an upside short sweep first. Estimated cumulative short liquidations reach roughly $8.5M versus just over $6M in longs across the displayed range. The dense short cluster at 0.0471–0.0483 sits close to price. 🔺 The first target is 0.0471–0.0477. A break and hold above 0.0477 shifts attention to 0.0481–0.0483. Successive large liquidation spikes could amplify the squeeze through this zone. 🎯 Holding above 0.0483 opens targets at 0.0486–0.0490, then 0.0501–0.0511. Density decreases beyond the first cluster, making the reaction around 0.0483 key to expectations for an extended move. ⚖️ Losing 0.0465 without a reclaim weakens the upside bias and shifts attention to 0.0453–0.0458, then the large long cluster at 0.0438–0.0444. Avoid chasing if price sweeps 0.0477 and falls back below 0.0471. #LiquidationMap

🚨 STRK/USDT PERPETUAL — KEY LEVELS TO WATCH | RECOVERY OR BEARISH TRAP? Starknet (STRK) is trading near $0.046539 (+1.45%), showing signs of a short-term recovery after recent selling pressure. Price is currently above MA(5), MA(10), and MA(20), indicating improving short-term momentum. However, STRK remains down 18.64% over 7 days, meaning buyers still have significant work to do before a stronger trend reversal can be confirmed. 📊 MARKET SNAPSHOT Last Price: $0.046539 Mark Price: $0.046539 24H High: $0.047539 24H Low: $0.045360 MA(5): $0.046277 MA(10): $0.046099 MA(20): $0.046231 Open Interest: $1.76M 24H Turnover: $3.74M 🟢 SUPPORT LEVELS Immediate Support: $0.046230–$0.046000 Major Support: $0.045360–$0.044935 Critical Support: $0.044114–$0.044024 🔴 RESISTANCE LEVELS Immediate Resistance: $0.046984 Major Resistance: $0.047539 Upside Target: $0.048500–$0.050000 📈 BULLISH SCENARIO If STRK holds above $0.0460 and breaks $0.046984 with strong buying volume, another test of $0.047539 becomes likely. A confirmed breakout could open the way toward $0.0485–$0.0500. 📉 BEARISH SCENARIO Failure to defend $0.0460 could bring sellers back into control, exposing $0.045360 and $0.044935. A breakdown below $0.0440 would significantly weaken the recovery setup. 📊 VOLUME & OPEN INTEREST 24H trading volume stands at 80.79M STRK, while the displayed candle volume is below its MA(5) and MA(10). This indicates that the current bounce still lacks strong volume confirmation. Open interest is around $1.76M. Traders should watch for rising volume and OI together with a price breakout to assess whether fresh positions are supporting the move. ⚠️ TRADING FOCUS STRK is attempting a short-term recovery, but the $0.047539 resistance remains the key breakout level. Can STRK reclaim $0.048 and reverse its weekly weakness, or will sellers reject the recovery again? Not financial advice. Always manage risk and confirm breakouts with volume. $STRK $UMXM $NEAR

$GRVT Ethereum’s planned Glamsterdam hard fork is facing additional delays after a security review found problems in two gas-scaling proposals. ChainSecurity’s findings prompted the cancellation of the second and final testnet, pushing the next rehearsal further out while teams assess the “second order” effects of the upgrade. The broader theme this week: automation is increasingly being used for both offense and defense. An account manager at Ethereum ecosystem group Eth Labs described using AI agents to scan for contract breakages, including coordinating their work through shared message boards—an approach inspired by past attacker behavior. Key takeaways Glamsterdam’s second testnet was cancelled after ChainSecurity identified vulnerabilities tied to EIP-8037 and EIP-8038 that could break gas-dependent contracts. Developers say the next testnet on Hoodi is not expected until teams model the knock-on effects of the fork more thoroughly. AI agents used for contract security testing were coordinated via a GitHub-based message board after researchers independently converged on similar scanning strategies. A separate cybersecurity story is drawing attention to PHP2Shell-era risk themes, while major network upgrades across Solana and StarkNet moved in different directions. Bitcoin Core is updating its disclosure policy as large language models make it easier to rediscover vulnerabilities quickly. Ethereum’s Glamsterdam delay after gas-scaling security findings Ethereum’s second and final testnet for the Glamsterdam hard fork was cancelled this week following a vulnerability discovery by ChainSecurity. The issues were linked to two gas scaling proposals—EIP-8037 and EIP-8038—both of which relate to how gas behaves during transaction execution. According to earlier coverage from Cointelegraph, the bugs were particularly dangerous for DeFi applications relying on current gas behavior. ChainSecurity’s research indicated that contracts built around the way gas currently works could fail in scenarios where execution hits gas limits, creating conditions an attacker might exploit. The risk is technical but consequential: if a call runs out of gas under new assumptions, the resulting contract behavior can diverge from what developers expected. The end result can be anything from broken functionality to exploitable edge cases, depending on how the application handles failed executions. Why “second order” effects matter more than the initial patch With the testnet exercise on Hoodi postponed, Ethereum developers are effectively pausing their rehearsal until they can better understand downstream impacts of the change. The source indicates that rescheduling is not expected until teams have gamed out “second order effects,” meaning not just the immediate protocol logic, but also how surrounding tooling, integrations, and contract patterns might respond. In an X post, Derek Chiang of Eth Labs said the vulnerability was discovered shortly before the deadline, describing the situation as being “a few minutes to midnight,” and adding that this forced teams to scramble to address the fallout. That timing underscores how brittle last-minute security reviews can be—and why teams are increasingly trying to move testing earlier in the process. “In the future, protocol designers would do well to conduct much more thorough analysis of potential breakages that their update might introduce, and to do so much earlier in the process.” AI agents, coordinated scanning, and a playbook borrowed from attackers Chiang also described how AI agents were used to search for potential contract breakages. Two researchers—one from Eth Labs and one from the Ethereum Foundation—reportedly spun up separate AI agents to scan contracts for vulnerabilities. Once they realized they were using the same general strategy, they coordinated their work by setting up a shared message board in the form of a GitHub repository. The description is notable because it mirrors how malicious actors have historically coordinated through shared channels. Chiang specifically compared the approach to the pattern seen in an “OpenAI <> Hugging Face hack” involving rogue agents that used message boards to synchronize their efforts. In this case, the same coordination mechanism was used to speed up defensive analysis. Beyond Glamsterdam, the exercise appears to be influencing how teams plan next: a second message board has been created to examine EIP-8198—also known as “Quick Slots”—which has been proposed for the subsequent Hegota hard fork. While it’s too early to know how many problems will surface there, the workflow suggests teams want to catch gas- and execution-related issues well before a final testnet deadline. Cybersecurity threads: PHP2Shell proof attempt and policy shifts Separately, the “Steal My Bitcoin” site continues to be used as a stress test in the wake of PHP2Shell vulnerabilities. The site is presented as an experiment intended to demonstrate that a Bitcoin wallet—estimated to be worth around $2,000—was not actually at risk from the “print-flag” behavior accessible via a PHP user account. At the time of writing, the site had reportedly been online for about 25 hours without a successful hack, though it had gone offline at intervals due to heavy traffic and probing. The story sits in the broader context of PHP-related security incidents: the Cointelegraph-linked report referenced emergency patches and precautionary downtime taken by government and other organizations in multiple countries. On the infrastructure side, Bitcoin Core is also adapting its security approach. In a post to the bitcoindev mailing list, developer Antoine Poinsot said that the classic approach—keeping vulnerability details under lengthy disclosure embargoes—has become less effective. The reason: large language models make it easier to rediscover flaws quickly, reducing the benefit of delaying public information and fixed releases. Poinsot said Bitcoin Core is therefore updating how it manages disclosure timing to “accommodate those.” For users, traders, and builders, these policy shifts matter because they affect how quickly fixes reach the ecosystem—and how quickly attackers might learn what to target. Network upgrades and governance: Solana’s Alpenglow and StarkNet’s post-quantum direction Solana’s first major consensus upgrade, Alpenglow, went live on mainnet around 1:54 pm UTC on Wednesday, according to the Solana Foundation’s Alpenglow dashboard. Agave developer Anza said the time for a transaction to become final decreased dramatically—from roughly 12.8 seconds to about 150 milliseconds. The upgrade is being rolled out in phases. The first phase, Votor, replaces the existing voting and finalization mechanism with direct validator voting and a certificate-based system, with an expectation that the headline transaction count will fall by about 60%. A later phase will introduce Rotor, aimed at replacing Turbine’s block data distribution. StarkNet, meanwhile, is taking a different path—at least at the research-and-planning level. The community voted to support research into becoming an independent, post-quantum layer-1 blockchain. The vote lasted seven days and reportedly attracted about 3,200 votes, with 93.52% of voting power in favor. StarkWare CEO Eli Ben-Sasson told Cointelegraph that StarkNet would begin work on a whitepaper and hopes to release a draft for public scrutiny in November. The source also states that any actual transition would require a separate binding governance vote, and StarkNet will continue operating as an Ethereum layer-2 for now. Regulation and markets: scrutiny around stablecoins and shifting disclosure rules On the regulatory front, Senator Richard Blumenthal has requested information from Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino after a Wall Street Journal report said the stablecoin firm inked a $6.3 million deal with a marketing company co-founded by former White House crypto adviser Bo Hines. In a Thursday letter, Blumenthal reportedly said the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations demanded records and information about contracts, payments, communications, and lobbying related to the agreement, raising questions about potential ethics, corruption, and lobbying rules. Tether said an external investigation found no evidence of wrongdoing. Finally, in traditional market commentary, JPMorgan Asset Management projected that Bitcoin could outperform U.S. stocks and gold over the next decade in its 2027 Long-Term Capital Market Assumptions report. The report also cautioned that Bitcoin’s volatility means it does not currently make sense as a diversifier due to unstable market correlations, describing Bitcoin as a speculative asset and a hedge against monetary easing. Looking ahead, the key watch items are whether Ethereum’s next Glamsterdam rehearsal on Hoodi reveals additional gas-related integration failures, how quickly teams can coordinate security testing for upcoming proposals like Quick Slots, and whether disclosure-policy changes in major ecosystems keep vulnerability management ahead of the pace set by AI-assisted discovery. This article was originally published as AI Agents Aid Recovery of ETH Glamsterdam Fork After “Steal My Bitcoin” Site on Crypto Breaking News – your trusted source for crypto news, Bitcoin news, and blockchain updates.

🚀 Bull Market Update — More Token Targets 🔥🌕 💎 APE — $5 🚀 OP — $10 🌊 ARKM — $10 ⚡ STRK — $5 🔥 ZRO — $10 💫 ZK — $5 🔗 ENS — $100 🌟 IMX — $10 💠 GALA — $1 🐕 FLOKI — $0.01 🚀 BONK — $0.001 💎 WIF — $10 🔥 RUNE — $50 🌊 ATOM — $100 ⚡ ALGO — $5 ✨ VET — $1 💫 EGLD — $500 🔗 FTM — $5 🚀 THETA — $20 💠 SAND — $5 🌟 MANA — $5 🔥 AXie — $100 💎 QNT — $500 ⚡ XMR — $1,000 🌊 HYPE — $100 🚀 TAO — $2,000 💫 RAY — $50 🔗 JTO — $10 🌟 PYTH — $5 💠 ORDI — $500 🔥 STX — $20 ⚡ MINA — $5 🚀 ZEC — $500 💎 KAVA — $5 🌊 COMP — $500 ✨ SNX — $20 💫 CRV — $5 🔗 LDO — $10 🌟 CHZ — $1 🚀 IOTA — $5